I tend to think Bruce puts an emphasis on defense at the 5. We are always going to guys who can light it up at other positions, but a rim protector who is a great rebounder is essential to having a complete team. Obviously it would be great to have a 5 who is the total package, but if he has the choice between a guy who can play great D and rebound or one who is a good offensive prospect, I would assume he takes the former. What would be ideal, imo, would be to sign a grad transfer 5 who could add some experience to the roster in addition to a HS prospect. If we miss on Cliff, that would make taking Soto a lot easier as we would not need to rely on him next year.
Agree here. I’m ok with taking as many of the high profile scorers at other positions as we can get and then go get a big physical grad transfer to bang it out down low. Just seems like if we have a big who can defend and rebound (Stretch) maybe a big who can do something different might be of value. Maybe Im wrongfully selling Stretch short of his offensive skills. Wiley and MAC have been key for us this year doing all three at times and I’m not sold on Stretch being ready to fill either of those roles completely next year. Seems like we would want a big that we could go to down low, or to shot the 3 ball at times if we need it. We were all over the Kessler kid and he seemed more like an offensive big than a D and rebound big.