Yahoo article implicates

[BlueWorldOrder74]

It’s all cool, bluebruh. We’re not really in a position to talk smack anymore. Looks like we’re going to half limp this one across the finish line and hope we can get healthy before the SEC tourney.

Good run and still talented though. Injuries suck. Your team is still good enough to win the SEC tourney just because they play so hard. I'll be honest, I was pulling for you guys mostly every game - and that started after you and your Boogs came to my board and started antics. Still get a laugh from the invasion. Funny funny stuff.

 

[Denim Vest]

 

[cookedw]

View embedded media

If what Miller says is correct, can Miller sue Schlabach?

 

[Denim Vest]

If what Miller says is correct, can Miller sue Schlabach?

Sure hope so. Would be fantastic.

 

[cookedw]

Sure hope so. Would be fantastic.

I don't think Schlabach has been heard from publicly, at least not on Twitter, since the Arizona guys (maybe a beat writer) destroyed not only his original story timelines, but also MS/ESPN's "corrected" timeline (and info).

Which was three days ago

 

[Harvey Specter]

We all know the report is true

 

[Denim Vest]

We all know the report is true

Makes no difference. Schalbach is a trash loser and Sean and Bruce will be meeting in the final 4 for years to come.

 

[stutsman23]

I don't think Schlabach has been heard from publicly, at least not on Twitter, since the Arizona guys (maybe a beat writer) destroyed not only his original story timelines, but also MS/ESPN's "corrected" timeline (and info).

Which was three days ago

The nearly 4 days of no tweets is almost like Rice going a few days without posting on the bunker... Schlabach hasn't gone a day without tweeting in years

 

[cookedw]

We all know the report is true

While I have no doubt that the basis of that story/report is true (Arizona/Miller paying players or discussing payment), the timeline and details that MS stated in the story (and the "correction") appear to have A LOT of holes in it. Even caused MS to backtrack, sort of throw his source under the bus, and disappear for a little while.

 

[BigtimeAub]

If what Miller says is correct, can Miller sue Schlabach?

If it impacts his employability or his livelihood, absolutely. That's defamation of character 101.

 

[DufnerFanBoy]

SI is now running a story that agrees with Miller and says ESPN’s source was wrong. What a mess for Schlabach.

 

[stutsman23]

SI is now running a story that agrees with Miller and says ESPN’s source was wrong. What a mess for Schlabach.

The timeline is definitely off. IMO, the tapes have Miller talking about paying a player. That player isn't the one Schlabach called out and the timeline is incorrect, but I have a hard time believing that he just made up Sean Miller for no reason at all... Hopefully this shit forces ESPN to start actually having proven facts before calling people out, but we all know that won't happen

 

[DufnerFanBoy]

The timeline is definitely off. IMO, the tapes have Miller talking about paying a player. That player isn't the one Schlabach called out and the timeline is incorrect, but I have a hard time believing that he just made up Sean Miller for no reason at all... Hopefully this shit forces ESPN to start actually having proven facts before calling people out, but we all know that won't happen

I think ESPN has the conversation right, but I don't think ESPN got much else right. I think Dawkins and Miller had a conversation. I don't think the player Schlabach mentioned is correct. I'm not sure a specific amount was mentioned. It sounds like the timeline was definitely wrong. And I'm not even sure Miller wanted any part of the deal.

This feels like Book Richardson or his attorney leaking info to try to help his case, in what way I don't know. I think Schlabach made a big mistake by reporting this based on one source and no way to corroborate the facts. He basically took one person's word, and that person might've had a vested interest in the information being slanted a certain way.

 

[stutsman23]

I think ESPN has the conversation right, but I don't think ESPN got much else right. I think Dawkins and Miller had a conversation. I don't think the player Schlabach mentioned is correct. I'm not sure a specific amount was mentioned. It sounds like the timeline was definitely wrong. And I'm not even sure Miller wanted any part of the deal.

This feels like Book Richardson or his attorney leaking info to try to help his case, in what way I don't know. I think Schlabach made a big mistake by reporting this based on one source and no way to corroborate the facts. He basically took one person's word, and that person might've had a vested interest in the information being slanted a certain way.

Agreed

 

[MomentInTheSun]

New stuff out today. Kansas gonna get messy