I have an incredible amount of respect for my sources, who generally discuss topics / issues with me in confidentiality. I will say this: if half of the Bunker is familiar with this person, I’ll be shocked. That doesn’t mean this person is a bad choice. In fact, several very highly respected individuals in college athletics have recommended this person emphatically. But I am anticipating a mixed reaction on the Bunker based on this person’s current (previous) position and lack of name recognition, particularly because this person hasn’t been mentioned by any sites as a potential candidate (that I’ve seen).
An AD beholden to no one? I hope your sources are correct.
Good stuff. Is that you in your avatar?
You should charge $10/month and be a huge d!ck to everybody who pays you. Although you’d have change your record of reliability and start getting stuff wrong, it seems to work well for the boog board tyrants
Well what's your personal opinion? Good, bad, or undecided?
the gobn has got to go. It's such a cancer to the school.
A mixed reaction on the bunker? Say it ain't so.
You are nasty brahYes, but a bad photo. Here’s a better one (I’m on top).
True, but there are so many strings tied to it. There will never be a shortage of rich guys who want to buy hulking teens for AUBURN. We just some who know their role like the guys up in tuscaloosa.
dumb money is worthless. Corrupt, dumb money is harmful.
Thanks for this. Can you say if this person is a sitting AD or has experience as a D1 AD?
All checks should be accepted but a smart AD limits the strings attached to them to those that are reasonable and not harmful to the organization. Some AD's will use that power for personal enrichment though, as OBBERN saw but did nothing about.
This is the last Chick-fil-A nugget I’ll be handing out, unfortunately. Everyone will know soon enough.
That's an interesting thought. Whoever has led their growth seems to habe done a great job.
Thanks for your contribution to making The GREG the premier boog community on the ethers.
