ADVERTISEMENT

OT: The DONALD's latest scandal

Stanley McRustler

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2016
266
1,248
93
The topic of yesterday's 60 Minutes Interview seems to have unhinged quite a few posters (for and against the POTUS) over on TBB. I figured I would come over here and get an opinion from some level headed folks
 
  • Like
Reactions: AUBKV
The guy is clearly a fuggin maniacal, dubiously incestuous dipshit, but this latest bit of news isn't gonnna change anyone's opinion about him. He already has so much baggage and his supporters don't care so it's not like this was ever gonna be the last straw for anyone. Trump is doing their dirty work so they'll let him have a pass on anything as long as he sticks to "the agenda."

The fact that he boinked a porn star ten years ago is insignificant imo. If they can prove that he used campaign funds to pay for her silence, then that's the only part of the stroy that matters.
 
The guy is clearly a fuggin maniacal, dubiously incestuous dipshit, but this latest bit of news isn't gonnna change anyone's opinion about him. He already has so much baggage and his supporters don't care so it's not like this was ever gonna be the last straw for anyone. Trump is doing their dirty work so they'll let him have a pass on anything as long as he sticks to "the agenda."

The fact that he boinked a porn star ten years ago is insignificant imo. If they can prove that he used campaign funds to pay for her silence, then that's the only part of the stroy that matters.
Policy wise, how is he doing a bad job? Also, incestuous? Come on, get off twitter with those psychos.
 
The people that support him will continue to support him(unless he kills another Pub). Everything the media try’s to make a big deal of now is just stuff everybody knew about him before they voted for him the first time.
 
I think it's hilarious how democrats use the exact same language they made fun of people for using about Obama but "it's different"

No it isn't. You're all (people who use that inflammatory language) idiots.
 
Ol DON is as intellectually unprepared as anyone has ever been for any job. That said, I don't give a shit about sex scandals apart watching the Bible beaters move the goal posts for their golden god. Good on him for being an old creepy dude I guess.
Trump intellectually unprepared, lmao. I guess you just got unlucky, right?
 
I immediately assume that Trump followers are severely lacking in the intelligence department...
 
I immediately assume that Trump followers are severely lacking in the intelligence department...
If I post my official iq test and credentials would you do the same and then admit you're wrong? (not going to dox myself obviously, but curious if you would)
 
In what way?
If Trump is such an idiot, shouldn’t most of the public have hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars themselves? Did he just get lucky over and over for 50 years of business?

The answer to your second question is more complicated. The highest levels of education, and education in general lean vastly to the left. Also, the media is responsible for most of public opinion and they lean the same way. Yet the people referenced don’t understand how to actually make money and simple economics. Mix the brainwashed of those sources with people voting for government benefits, and you have ignorance across the board mixed in with people that have good hearts. That makes up the majority of the liberal base.

Also, the supposed inferior intellectual just denuclearized NK while accomplishing the trade deal with SK.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: howa5503
If Trump is such an idiot, shouldn’t most of the public have hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars themselves? Did he just get lucky over and over for 50 years of business?

The answer to your second question is more complicated. The highest levels of education, and education in general lean vastly to the left. Also, the media is responsible for most of public opinion and they lean the same way. Yet the people referenced don’t understand how to actually make money and simple economics. Mix the brainwashed of those sources with people voting for government benefits, and you have ignorance across the board mixed in with people that have good hearts. That makes up the majority of the liberal base.

Also, the supposed inferior intellectual just denuclearized NK while accomplishing the trade deal with SK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slippin Jimmy
no one answered my question. how would you feel about taking objective tests and then lining up objective education levels and then making blanket statements about how people vote.
 
I'd do it as long as the IQ test was one of the official ones on Facebook.
Be honest. Would you be willing to take a real iq test and put it up against mine, as well as your education background, against mine, and post it publicly, and then retract your statements if it turned out my iq was higher and I had more education? Or would you resort to more name calling and convince yourself that "iq tests are dumb" and "a 100 iq is pretty good" or some shit.


I have a feeling it would be the latter. Which is why I think all of your trolly posting is bullshit, because you'd never put your money where you mouth is, it makes you look weak and well...cowardly. hmmm
 
Be honest. Would you be willing to take a real iq test and put it up against mine, as well as your education background, against mine, and post it publicly, and then retract your statements if it turned out my iq was higher and I had more education? Or would you resort to more name calling and convince yourself that "iq tests are dumb" and "a 100 iq is pretty good" or some shit.


I have a feeling it would be the latter. Which is why I think all of your trolly posting is bullshit, because you'd never put your money where you mouth is, it makes you look weak and well...cowardly. hmmm
What the fvck are you talking about? Who did I call a name?

Not sure how I got into all this. I was making a joke about Facebook IQ tests. But yeah, I'm all in for some competition. I had a decent IQ when they did an aptitude test in seventh grade but I'd be interested to know what it is now. I've gotten more stupid over the years to be sure. I did take the Wonderlic as part of a job interview in 2006 and scored a 33. Not sure how that equates to IQ. Again, I'm far dumber today than I was 12 years ago.

Comparing education should be fairly easy. I've got a master's degree. Nothing special I guess.

Anyway, I'm not sure how I got myself into this dick measuring contest but you're welcome to whip that hawg on out whenever you're feeling fruity.
 
What the fvck are you talking about? Who did I call a name?

Not sure how I got into all this. I was making a joke about Facebook IQ tests. But yeah, I'm all in for some competition. I had a decent IQ when they did an aptitude test in seventh grade but I'd be interested to know what it is now. I've gotten more stupid over the years to be sure. I did take the Wonderlic as part of a job interview in 2006 and scored a 33. Not sure how that equates to IQ. Again, I'm far dumber today than I was 12 years ago.

Comparing education should be fairly easy. I've got a master's degree. Nothing special I guess.

Anyway, I'm not sure how I got myself into this dick measuring contest but you're welcome to whip that hawg on out whenever you're feeling fruity.
Doubt anyone's going to believe it regardless, but I scored a 155 and a 135 when I last took it at 10 years old, I'd like to take one again since it does change as you get older. I'm young, but on my second BS, will get a masters after.

You got into a dick measuring contest by saying that Trump was intellectually unprepared. Despite the fact that he went to a better school and had an arguably harder degree path than Obama, then he built an empire, while Obama was a community organizer, and then he was the FIRST candidate to win an election with a massive budget deficit.

@Slippin Jimmy then moved in with the blanket "all trump voters are idiots"

well folks, I voted for Trump and I know for a fact that by all standards of measurement that most people consider valid I am not an idiot, and most people I know who also qualify as such wouldn't make statements like that regardless of their beliefs.

He out maneuvered a wildly corrupt republican party that didn't even want him elected. He out maneuvered the media who FOR SURE had a massive bias against him, they even admitted it.

Now, someone who honestly pulls those kinds of statements out of their ass strikes me as not very intelligent. You think the Billionaire potus that no one in the establishment that has ruled this country for 60 years wanted, is intellectually unprepared? Because he tweets dumb shit?

I didn't like Obama, and I don't think I'd particularly like Trump. But I'd never say that someone who has risen to that level is dumb....you don't stumble into being the most powerful man on the planet.
I said the same shit to people who said that about Obama, you can believe he's misguided. You can disagree, you can hate him for all I care, but if there's one thing these guys are not it's stupid.

I take it your masters is in something like public policy? Your posts ITT come off as entirely thoughtless and presumptuous. I really don't give a **** who someone votes for but claiming to be intellectually superior while exhibiting the opposite behavior triggers me and these days it's a classic left wing move. Horrible look.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seaborn56
Again, no idea how I got myself into this mess, but here we go.
Doubt anyone's going to believe it regardless, but I scored a 155 and a 135 when I last took it at 10 years old, I'd like to take one again since it does change as you get older.
Yeah, nobody is going to believe that. You were on par with Jefferson and Edison as a ten year old but your sentence structure looks like, well, a ten year old's. Also, who the fvck brags about a test they took when they were 10? I mean, I was at least a teenager when I took mine. Advantage Toaster.
I'm young, but on my second BS, will get a masters after.
Based on the way you were calling me out I expected something a little more impressive. Advantage Toaster.
You got into a dick measuring contest by saying that Trump was intellectually unprepared.
What does that have to do with your IQ or level of education as it compares to mine? This is a truly bizarre conversation. And, yeah, I think the President was (and is) intellectually unprepared for the job of being the President. He's a perfectly good fit to run a licensing company or host a reality show, but being the leader of the free world takes just a bit more IMO.
Despite the fact that he went to a better school and had an arguably harder degree path than Obama
First, why does every conversation about Trump ALWAYS go back to Obama? If we're judging the dude on his own merits, why play the comparison game? Anyway, their educational paths are apples and oranges but, if we must: Obama got his undergrad at Columbia (#6) and a law degree at Harvard (#1). Trump got his undergrad from Wharton at Penn (#14). Advantage BARRY. It's not arguable.



Then you ramble for 4-5 poorly thought out paragraphs without much direction other than assuring us all how brilliant you are before attacking me again. I'm still not sure why but I think it's because you disagreed with an opinion I shared.



I take it your masters is in something like public policy?
Lol no. And it's master's. Possessive. And you don't possess one. Advantage TOASTER.

Horrible look.
Man, I gotta say, the one looking horrible here isn't me. Woof. I've got the tally right now as follows:

TOASTER: 3
BARRY: 1
ULTRA SENSITIVE YOUNGSTER: 0
 
ramblings of an oudle fat washed up desk jockey


Lets assume, that because I don't specifically write my posts to read like an editorial it doesn't disqualify and iq test I took damn near 20 years ago.
Secondly, yes, in fact 1 in 50~ people have an iq similar to Edison (I'm assuming you did your research on that) meaning that statistically, we have about 50 posters on this board, most of us went to college at least once, there are likely at least two people here with very high iqs...sorry it offends you. You clearly don't have a degree in statistics.

Advantage Millennial with common sense.

You know why people bring up Obama and Trumps background. Because one group will wildly criticize the other for things they willingly overlook in their chosen candidate. Just like you do here.

How old are you? 45? 55? Were you on track to make 135k+ by the time you're 30? I am. I'd wager my trajectory, if you compared our lives at the same age is lightyears ahead of yours. That's like saying "I'm old and slow as **** but look at me, I got a 20 year head start and I beat you to the 20 mile mark, you must be slow" what a ridiculous statement.

Advantage: Millennial with common sense.

Nothing you said follows any sort of logical/qualitative comparative analysis.

One thing I will say though, I thought Trump had an MBA from Wharton, but he has an economics degree from there. Impressive still, but I was wrong about that, Obama objectively had more formal education and likely it better prepared him in the classroom at least, to be president.

Now had he ever run a company etc? No. But I must retract my statement about the education.

Advantage Toast made one good point.

What's your masters in toasty? I really want to know, and where did you get it from?

It's econ from AUM isn't it...and you made all Cs...
 
Last edited:
it doesn't disqualify and iq test I took damn near 20 years ago.
I think the fact that you took it twenty years ago when you were ten years old disqualifies the test.

Secondly, yes, in fact 1 in 50~ people have an iq similar to Edison (I'm assuming you did your research on that)
No. The only thing I looked up were school rankings.

there are likely at least two people here with very high iqs...sorry it offends you.
It doesn't offend me. I agree with this sentiment, I just know you aren't one of them. I'm not either. My guesses would be MITS for sure and probably Jimmy or Jeramy. Maybe a few others, too, as only the elite have landed on the Greg.

Because one group will wildly criticize the other for things they willingly overlook in their chosen candidate. Just like you do here.
Link to where I criticized Trump for anything other than his intelligence and/or overlooked Obama's apparent lack of intelligence. You're unhinged. Anyway, when did I ever say Obama was my "chosen candidate?"

How old are you? 45? 55?
I'm 78 years old.

Were you on track to make 135k+ by the time you're 30? I am. I'd wager my trajectory, if you compared our lives at the same age is lightyears ahead of yours. That's like saying "I'm old and slow as **** but look at me, I got a 20 year head start and I beat you to the 20 mile mark, you must be slow" what a ridiculous statement.
Goddamn if this isn't some Rice-level shitposting. Pull yourself together.

Nothing you said follows any sort of logical/qualitative comparative analysis.
Got anymore of them five dollar words? I'm dazzled by your vocabulary and now know I'm surely outmatched!!

I thought Trump had an MBA from Wharton, but he has an economics degree from there.
You'd think a guy with a genius-level IQ would know his President's scholastic background.

What's your masters in toasty? I really want to know, and where did you get it from?
Quantum Physics in Theology from Southern New Hampshire University - Phoenix Campus. All gold stars on my report cards.




I still don't know how I got into this. I just made a joke about Facebook and now this clusterfvck. Anyway, I'm actually feeling pretty good about myself if I'm being honest. I thought you'd be a really accomplished dude from all the rhetoric. Turns out you're "on track" to make some pretty good money by the time you're 30 but haven't really done much. Kudos I guess. Stay after it, superstar.

A word of advice that both you and the President would be wise to heed: if you're jumping up and down screaming about how you're the smartest guy in the room, you are most assuredly not the smartest guy in the room.
 
Lets assume, that because I don't specifically write my posts to read like an editorial it doesn't disqualify and iq test I took damn near 20 years ago.
Secondly, yes, in fact 1 in 50~ people have an iq similar to Edison (I'm assuming you did your research on that) meaning that statistically, we have about 50 posters on this board, most of us went to college at least once, there are likely at least two people here with very high iqs...sorry it offends you. You clearly don't have a degree in statistics.

Advantage Millennial with common sense.

You know why people bring up Obama and Trumps background. Because one group will wildly criticize the other for things they willingly overlook in their chosen candidate. Just like you do here.

How old are you? 45? 55? Were you on track to make 135k+ by the time you're 30? I am. I'd wager my trajectory, if you compared our lives at the same age is lightyears ahead of yours. That's like saying "I'm old and slow as **** but look at me, I got a 20 year head start and I beat you to the 20 mile mark, you must be slow" what a ridiculous statement.

Advantage: Millennial with common sense.

Nothing you said follows any sort of logical/qualitative comparative analysis.

One thing I will say though, I thought Trump had an MBA from Wharton, but he has an economics degree from there. Impressive still, but I was wrong about that, Obama objectively had more formal education and likely it better prepared him in the classroom at least, to be president.

Now had he ever run a company etc? No. But I must retract my statement about the education.

Advantage Toast made one good point.

What's your masters in toasty? I really want to know, and where did you get it from?

It's econ from AUM isn't it...and you made all Cs...
Hate to interrupt you two, but I think we’d get along. You reside in bham?
 
Lets assume, that because I don't specifically write my posts to read like an editorial it doesn't disqualify and iq test I took damn near 20 years ago.
Secondly, yes, in fact 1 in 50~ people have an iq similar to Edison (I'm assuming you did your research on that) meaning that statistically, we have about 50 posters on this board, most of us went to college at least once, there are likely at least two people here with very high iqs...sorry it offends you. You clearly don't have a degree in statistics.

Advantage Millennial with common sense.

You know why people bring up Obama and Trumps background. Because one group will wildly criticize the other for things they willingly overlook in their chosen candidate. Just like you do here.

How old are you? 45? 55? Were you on track to make 135k+ by the time you're 30? I am. I'd wager my trajectory, if you compared our lives at the same age is lightyears ahead of yours. That's like saying "I'm old and slow as **** but look at me, I got a 20 year head start and I beat you to the 20 mile mark, you must be slow" what a ridiculous statement.

Advantage: Millennial with common sense.

Nothing you said follows any sort of logical/qualitative comparative analysis.

One thing I will say though, I thought Trump had an MBA from Wharton, but he has an economics degree from there. Impressive still, but I was wrong about that, Obama objectively had more formal education and likely it better prepared him in the classroom at least, to be president.

Now had he ever run a company etc? No. But I must retract my statement about the education.

Advantage Toast made one good point.

What's your masters in toasty? I really want to know, and where did you get it from?

It's econ from AUM isn't it...and you made all Cs...
rmdSx.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT